↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass-participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass-participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme
Published in
Ibis, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2012.01229.x
Authors

JUDIT K. SZABO, RICHARD A. FULLER, HUGH P. POSSINGHAM

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 62 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 43%
Unspecified 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,627,653
of 12,354,842 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#1,384
of 1,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,439
of 116,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.