You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthy lifestyle and the risk of pancreatic cancer in the EPIC study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-019-00559-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabine Naudin, Vivian Viallon, Dana Hashim, Heinz Freisling, Mazda Jenab, Elisabete Weiderpass, Flavie Perrier, Fiona McKenzie, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Christina C. Dahm, Kim Overvad, Francesca R. Mancini, Vinciane Rebours, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Verena Katzke, Rudolf Kaaks, Manuela Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Eleni Peppa, Anna Karakatsani, Antonia Trichopoulou, Valeria Pala, Giovana Masala, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Anne M. May, Carla H. van Gils, Charlotta Rylander, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, María Dolores Chirlaque López, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Eva Ardanaz, José Ramón Quirós, Pilar Amiano Exezarreta, Malin Sund, Isabel Drake, Sara Regnér, Ruth C. Travis, Nick Wareham, Dagfinn Aune, Elio Riboli, Marc J. Gunter, Eric J. Duell, Paul Brennan, Pietro Ferrari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| France | 4 | 9% |
| Mexico | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,163,007
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#173
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,557
of 352,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.