↓ Skip to main content

Threatened Reef Corals of the World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Threatened Reef Corals of the World
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danwei Huang

Abstract

A substantial proportion of the world's living species, including one-third of the reef-building corals, are threatened with extinction and in pressing need of conservation action. In order to reduce biodiversity loss, it is important to consider species' contribution to evolutionary diversity along with their risk of extinction for the purpose of setting conservation priorities. Here I reconstruct the most comprehensive tree of life for the order Scleractinia (1,293 species) that includes all 837 living reef species, and employ a composite measure of phylogenetic distinctiveness and extinction risk to identify the most endangered lineages that would not be given top priority on the basis of risk alone. The preservation of these lineages, not just the threatened species, is vital for safeguarding evolutionary diversity. Tests for phylogeny-associated patterns show that corals facing elevated extinction risk are not clustered on the tree, but species that are susceptible, resistant or resilient to impacts such as bleaching and disease tend to be close relatives. Intensification of these threats or extirpation of the endangered lineages could therefore result in disproportionate pruning of the coral tree of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 6 2%
United States 6 2%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 272 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 24%
Student > Master 60 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Other 19 6%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 54%
Environmental Science 63 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 7%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 31 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#2,818,276
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,592
of 223,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,861
of 173,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#550
of 3,737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.