RT @fleroy1974: Johnston et al (2019) recommend "to continue rather than reduce consumption of unprocessed red meat or processed meat" Su…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @Bunker_D_: Encore une fois excellent, @T_Fiolet revient sur la récente remise en question des recommandations sur la consommation de v…
RT @aliettejonkers: Doorgaan met vlees eten, ja, óók rood en bewerkt vlees, adviseren wetenschappers in Annals of Internal Medicine. Het be…
Let’s hope that’s a crack in the door on evaluating studies scientifically, instead of for the sponsors.
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @KenDBerryMD: "Harvard warned that the conclusions of these guidelines “harm the credibility of nutrition science and erode public trust…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
Any experienced doctor including myself will tell you otherwise. Shame in a 19+ impact factor journal for publishing this. Red and Processed Meat Guideline Recommendations | Annals of Internal Medicine | American College of Physicians https://t.co/xJY3z
RT @megustastarbien: Comer menos #carne roja o procesada no es la receta para una mejor #salud Estudios de baja calidad o realizados por p…
@ABayerTom @hswapnil @barttels2 @mikejohansenmd @medrants Recs are here: https://t.co/rBAi4iRLYd "For adults 18 years of age or older, we suggest continuing current unprocessed red meat consumption (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence)."
I only read the abstract. The conclusions are weak recommendations based on low-certainty evidence. The analysis is misnamed a guideline in my opinion. It may be correct, but we just do not know. https://t.co/2RQbO68OMi Should I do a podcast on this?
Esta revisión no encontró, entre otros hallazgos, evidencia convincente acerca de los beneficios directos para la salud de reducir el consumo de carne no procesada. https://t.co/rZvoAnrQ0P Debemos reducir el consumo de carne, no eliminarlo, por razones a
Encore une fois excellent, @T_Fiolet revient sur la récente remise en question des recommandations sur la consommation de viande. Thread à lire jusqu'au bout, où l'on trouvera critique et remise en perspective. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
@ajoykumarmd @Medscape ACP was not involved in the development of these guidelines and they are not ACP recommendations. The guidelines were developed by NutriRECS and published in Annals of Internal Medicine. We invite you to comment directly at https://t
“Red and Processed Meat Guideline Recommendations” This study is telling people to eat red & processed meat & it’s all over the news. Is this going to make our jobs even more difficult to achieve dietary compliance from patients? What’s your t
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
there it is
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @fleroy1974: Johnston et al (2019) recommend "to continue rather than reduce consumption of unprocessed red meat or processed meat" Su…
Why do I have a feeling that political considerations will have results like these buried?
RT @Scottyhile: All of this is based on cutting out 3 servings of meat. Not based on eliminating it. https://t.co/UGOMkzA195 https://t.co…
RT @Scottyhile: All of this is based on cutting out 3 servings of meat. Not based on eliminating it. https://t.co/UGOMkzA195 https://t.co…
All of this is based on cutting out 3 servings of meat. Not based on eliminating it. https://t.co/UGOMkzA195
RT @NutriRebel: Los vínculos entre comer carne roja y la enfermedad y la muerte son pequeños, y la calidad de la evidencia es de baja a muy…
RT @CarynZinn: The most rigorous review I've ever seen of meat/processed meat on health outcomes. What's impressive? Attention to panel sel…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @LaVascaHija: Un día X cosa es veneno y al otro ya no. Así siempre. https://t.co/ryK3Tn8qh2
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @Mangan150: Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past r…
Key phrase from new meat study: "meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes" Any past results that said otherwise were based on confounding factors. https://t.co/ZGTDYgE64i
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
Un día X cosa es veneno y al otro ya no. Así siempre.
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @EricaHauver: 6/The authors reversed decades of dietary guidance based on the totality & quality of the evidence using the GRADE methodo…
RT @CarynZinn: The most rigorous review I've ever seen of meat/processed meat on health outcomes. What's impressive? Attention to panel sel…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @kuwamitsuosamu: 早いな、BBC。夜にゆっくり読もうと思っていた https://t.co/ZrCywak9Pr がもう記事になっている。 https://t.co/p9wufwItbo
RT @puddleg: @bigfatsurprise Here it is @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas the best part is watching @HarvardHealth throwing a hissy fit https://t.…
RT @whsource: Exhaustive set of reviews of RCT and observational evidence conclude that there is little evidence that red and processed mea…
RT @kuwamitsuosamu: 早いな、BBC。夜にゆっくり読もうと思っていた https://t.co/ZrCywak9Pr がもう記事になっている。 https://t.co/p9wufwItbo
早いな、BBC。夜にゆっくり読もうと思っていた https://t.co/ZrCywak9Pr がもう記事になっている。
RT @ichiipsy: 赤身肉や加工肉を食べ続けても健康にはほとんど影響しないという、驚くべきシステマティックレビューがAnnals of Internal Medicineで発表されました。 赤身肉や加工肉を平均的に消費することで起こる健康への影響は、ほとんど無視できるレ…
@GreenWalker92 @GeWoessner En effet il faut être très très prudent : https://t.co/4CtssnxYPk
Study on red meat and processed meat consumption by colleague @NutriRational can be found here: https://t.co/wr93sSU4p2 The panel in this study suggests adults should continue current unprocessed red #meat consumption.
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @Nutri_Daniel: De la misma forma que hace unos años tuvimos que acallar los titulares alarmistas que igualaban la carne al tabaco... Aho…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
Alors que j'achève ce thread, je découvre que @T_Fiolet a déjà tweeté avec moins de passion sur les garde-fous qu'il faut poser, et qui apparaissent avec évidence quand on prend la peine de lire la publication originale : https://t.co/tOZ4Kp325g
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
El estudio, publicado en la revista Annals of Internal Medicine está firmado por 14 investigadores y analiza 5 revisiones sistemáticas que incluyen cientos de estudios y millones de participantes https://t.co/sgV1zfkrsZ
RT @Nutri_Daniel: De la misma forma que hace unos años tuvimos que acallar los titulares alarmistas que igualaban la carne al tabaco... Aho…
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @megustastarbien: Comer menos #carne roja o procesada no es la receta para una mejor #salud Estudios de baja calidad o realizados por p…
RT @BeefLambNZ: A new report from an international panel of independent experts reveals the supposed benefits of abstaining from meat aren'…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @Nutri_Daniel: De la misma forma que hace unos años tuvimos que acallar los titulares alarmistas que igualaban la carne al tabaco... Aho…
RT @Nutri_Daniel: De la misma forma que hace unos años tuvimos que acallar los titulares alarmistas que igualaban la carne al tabaco... Aho…
RT @ichiipsy: 赤身肉や加工肉を食べ続けても健康にはほとんど影響しないという、驚くべきシステマティックレビューがAnnals of Internal Medicineで発表されました。 赤身肉や加工肉を平均的に消費することで起こる健康への影響は、ほとんど無視できるレ…
RT @megustastarbien: Comer menos #carne roja o procesada no es la receta para una mejor #salud Estudios de baja calidad o realizados por p…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
RT @whsource: Exhaustive set of reviews of RCT and observational evidence conclude that there is little evidence that red and processed mea…
Attention lorsqu'une étude (même une méta-analyse) sort, fait du buzz, et semble vouloir remettre en question un "consensus" 🙏🔽🔽🔽🔽
RT @geoffsmithsmind: @JunkScience Actually a series of three papers https://t.co/rvwrUZcNXX, https://t.co/Pz6YxTvNNa, and https://t.co/2oc1…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: So here are the 3 scientific publications that will change the debate on whether or not it's safe to eat meat: https://t…
@Guy__Moux @Damkyan_Omega D'ailleurs une bonne première analyse ici par @T_Fiolet : https://t.co/0Xx3u9v8JH
@alt_fda @alt_cdc Two other studies from the same issue. https://t.co/m3bxRxgalm https://t.co/lMMUHTZYgQ
RT @Mangan150: Here's the journal article that has mainstream nutrition in a hissy fit: Basically, go ahead and eat red meat and processed…
RT @puddleg: @bigfatsurprise Here it is @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas the best part is watching @HarvardHealth throwing a hissy fit https://t.…
RT @centinel5051: Una nueva gran revisión concluye que no hay suficiente evidencia para recomendar reducir el consumo de carne con el objet…
RT @fleroy1974: Johnston et al (2019) recommend "to continue rather than reduce consumption of unprocessed red meat or processed meat" Su…
RT @KenDBerryMD: "Harvard warned that the conclusions of these guidelines “harm the credibility of nutrition science and erode public trust…