You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early prediction of noninvasive ventilation failure in COPD patients: derivation, internal validation, and external validation of a simple risk score
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0585-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Duan, Shengyu Wang, Ping Liu, Xiaoli Han, Yao Tian, Fan Gao, Jing Zhou, Junhuan Mou, Qian Qin, Jingrong Yu, Linfu Bai, Lintong Zhou, Rui Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 14% |
Mexico | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,119,236
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#422
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,049
of 356,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.