You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581st |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua P. Metlay, Grant W. Waterer, Ann C. Long, Antonio Anzueto, Jan Brozek, Kristina Crothers, Laura A. Cooley, Nathan C. Dean, Michael J. Fine, Scott A. Flanders, Marie R. Griffin, Mark L. Metersky, Daniel M. Musher, Marcos I. Restrepo, Cynthia G. Whitney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,491 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 512 | 34% |
| Spain | 64 | 4% |
| Canada | 57 | 4% |
| Mexico | 48 | 3% |
| Colombia | 33 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 30 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 30 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 22 | 1% |
| Other | 172 | 12% |
| Unknown | 501 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1041 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 272 | 18% |
| Scientists | 157 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,874 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2874 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 396 | 14% |
| Other | 240 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 218 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 209 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 178 | 6% |
| Other | 429 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1204 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 945 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 296 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 105 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 1% |
| Other | 179 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1254 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1554. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,090
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#2
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114
of 356,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#1
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.