↓ Skip to main content

Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
418 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise M Helsingen, Per Olav Vandvik, Henriette C Jodal, Thomas Agoritsas, Lyubov Lytvyn, Joseph C Anderson, Reto Auer, Silje Bjerkelund Murphy, Majid Abdulrahman Almadi, Douglas A Corley, Casey Quinlan, Jonathan M Fuchs, Annette McKinnon, Amir Qaseem, Anja Fog Heen, Reed A C Siemieniuk, Mette Kalager, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Michael Bretthauer, Gordon Guyatt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 418 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 17%
Other 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 61 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 446. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#49,715
of 22,558,632 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,002
of 59,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#991
of 295,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#25
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,558,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.