↓ Skip to main content

Freddie Mercury—acoustic analysis of speaking fundamental frequency, vibrato, and subharmonics

Overview of attention for article published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 211)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
98 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
504 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
10 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Freddie Mercury—acoustic analysis of speaking fundamental frequency, vibrato, and subharmonics
Published in
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, April 2016
DOI 10.3109/14015439.2016.1156737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian T. Herbst, Stellan Hertegard, Daniel Zangger-Borch, Per-Åke Lindestad

Abstract

Freddie Mercury was one of the twentieth century's best-known singers of commercial contemporary music. This study presents an acoustical analysis of his voice production and singing style, based on perceptual and quantitative analysis of publicly available sound recordings. Analysis of six interviews revealed a median speaking fundamental frequency of 117.3 Hz, which is typically found for a baritone voice. Analysis of voice tracks isolated from full band recordings suggested that the singing voice range was 37 semitones within the pitch range of F#2 (about 92.2 Hz) to G5 (about 784 Hz). Evidence for higher phonations up to a fundamental frequency of 1,347 Hz was not deemed reliable. Analysis of 240 sustained notes from 21 a-cappella recordings revealed a surprisingly high mean fundamental frequency modulation rate (vibrato) of 7.0 Hz, reaching the range of vocal tremor. Quantitative analysis utilizing a newly introduced parameter to assess the regularity of vocal vibrato corroborated its perceptually irregular nature, suggesting that vibrato (ir)regularity is a distinctive feature of the singing voice. Imitation of subharmonic phonation samples by a professional rock singer, documented by endoscopic high-speed video at 4,132 frames per second, revealed a 3:1 frequency locked vibratory pattern of vocal folds and ventricular folds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 504 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Engineering 7 6%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 33 30%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#10,949
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
#1
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135
of 314,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them