↓ Skip to main content

Quality of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or kidney cancer: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or kidney cancer: a systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin Zhou, Marije van Melle, Hardeep Singh, Willie Hamilton, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Fiona M Walter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 20 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,379,997
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,685
of 22,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,916
of 350,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#99
of 829 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 829 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.