You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mirna Expression Profiles Identify Drivers in Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033663 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ada Piepoli, Francesca Tavano, Massimiliano Copetti, Tommaso Mazza, Orazio Palumbo, Anna Panza, Francesco Fabio di Mola, Valerio Pazienza, Gianluigi Mazzoccoli, Giuseppe Biscaglia, Annamaria Gentile, Nicola Mastrodonato, Massimo Carella, Fabio Pellegrini, Pierluigi di Sebastiano, Angelo Andriulli |
| Abstract |
Altered expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) hallmarks many cancer types. The study of the associations of miRNA expression profile and cancer phenotype could help identify the links between deregulation of miRNA expression and oncogenic pathways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,246,549
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,714
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,147
of 160,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#491
of 3,721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.