↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for idiopathic toe walking

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for idiopathic toe walking
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012363.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoni J Caserta, Verity Pacey, Michael C Fahey, Kelly Gray, Raoul HH Engelbert, Cylie M Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 64 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 19%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 76 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,267,251
of 18,897,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,131
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,394
of 283,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,897,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.