You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Critical Role of NADPH Oxidase in Neuronal Oxidative Damage and Microglia Activation following Traumatic Brain Injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034504 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Quan-Guang Zhang, Melissa D. Laird, Dong Han, Khoi Nguyen, Erin Scott, Yan Dong, Krishnan M. Dhandapani, Darrell W. Brann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
Researcher | 19 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 23 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#186,369
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,191
of 177,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,964
of 3,751 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,751 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.