↓ Skip to main content

Distribution, relative abundance and risks from fisheries to threatened Glyphis sharks and sawfishes in northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Endangered Species Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution, relative abundance and risks from fisheries to threatened Glyphis sharks and sawfishes in northern Australia
Published in
Endangered Species Research, August 2013
DOI 10.3354/esr00513
Authors

IC Field, BJ Tillett, R Charters, GJ Johnson, RC Buckworth, MG Meekan, CJA Bradshaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Arab Emirates 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,827,452
of 17,359,532 outputs
Outputs from Endangered Species Research
#435
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,530
of 269,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endangered Species Research
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,359,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.