↓ Skip to main content

Public Disaster Communication and Child and Family Disaster Mental Health: a Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public Disaster Communication and Child and Family Disaster Mental Health: a Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Evidence
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11920-016-0690-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Brian Houston, Jennifer First, Matthew L. Spialek, Mary E. Sorenson, Megan Koch

Abstract

Children have been identified as particularly vulnerable to psychological and behavioral difficulties following disaster. Public child and family disaster communication is one public health tool that can be utilized to promote coping/resilience and ameliorate maladaptive child reactions following an event. We conducted a review of the public disaster communication literature and identified three main functions of child and family disaster communication: fostering preparedness, providing psychoeducation, and conducting outreach. Our review also indicates that schools are a promising system for child and family disaster communication. We complete our review with three conclusions. First, theoretically, there appears to be a great opportunity for public disaster communication focused on child disaster reactions. Second, empirical research assessing the effects of public child and family disaster communication is essentially nonexistent. Third, despite the lack of empirical evidence in this area, there is opportunity for public child and family disaster communication efforts that address new domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Grenada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 19%
Psychology 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 43 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,619,610
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#631
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,702
of 275,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.