You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management of peri-implantitis: a systematic review, 2010–2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-1735-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nisha Mahato, Xiaohong Wu, Lu Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 58% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 79 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,680,156
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,302
of 1,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,752
of 406,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#108
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.