↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Bank Compacting on Frogs: Can the Density of Hyla japonica Be Recovered by Installment of PVC Pipe Artificial Refuges in the Banks of Rice Fields?

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Bank Compacting on Frogs: Can the Density of Hyla japonica Be Recovered by Installment of PVC Pipe Artificial Refuges in the Banks of Rice Fields?
Published in
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 2006
DOI 10.1303/jjaez.2006.331
Authors

Toshiaki Hirai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,592,304
of 13,755,046 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#33
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,886
of 220,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them