You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine Ingestion Reverses the Circadian Rhythm Effects on Neuromuscular Performance in Highly Resistance-Trained Men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033807 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo Mora-Rodríguez, Jesús García Pallarés, Álvaro López-Samanes, Juan Fernando Ortega, Valentín E. Fernández-Elías |
| Abstract |
To investigate whether caffeine ingestion counteracts the morning reduction in neuromuscular performance associated with the circadian rhythm pattern. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 24% |
| Spain | 17 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 12% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 17% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 87 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#309,521
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,406
of 225,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,303
of 174,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#63
of 3,718 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,718 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.