You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Phylogenomic Study of Human, Dog, and Mouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gina Cannarozzi, Adrian Schneider, Gaston Gonnet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,424,061
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,023
of 8,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,436
of 168,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.