↓ Skip to main content

Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Gandolfo, Peter AG Sandercock, Massimo Conti

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,099,536
of 13,645,026 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,103
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,474
of 163,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,645,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.