You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality-Controlled Small-Scale Production of a Well-Defined Bacteriophage Cocktail for Use in Human Clinical Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004944 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Merabishvili, Jean-Paul Pirnay, Gilbert Verbeken, Nina Chanishvili, Marina Tediashvili, Nino Lashkhi, Thea Glonti, Victor Krylov, Jan Mast, Luc Van Parys, Rob Lavigne, Guido Volckaert, Wesley Mattheus, Gunther Verween, Peter De Corte, Thomas Rose, Serge Jennes, Martin Zizi, Daniel De Vos, Mario Vaneechoutte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 543 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 89 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 16% |
| Researcher | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 12% |
| Unknown | 123 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 146 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 81 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 75 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 144 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#788,349
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,427
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,820
of 112,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#33
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.