You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature17946 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexis C. Komor, Yongjoo B. Kim, Michael S. Packer, John A. Zuris, David R. Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 407 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 99 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 10% |
| Japan | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| France | 11 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 161 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 258 | 63% |
| Scientists | 131 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,757 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4682 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 959 | 20% |
| Researcher | 729 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 630 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 490 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 208 | 4% |
| Other | 556 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1185 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1546 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 983 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 213 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 157 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 125 | 3% |
| Other | 433 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1300 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#9,794
of 26,127,783 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#992
of 99,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107
of 315,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#15
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,127,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.