You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of ‘on-pack’ pictorial health warning labels and calorie information labels on drink choice: A laboratory experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Appetite, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104484 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleni Mantzari, Rachel Pechey, Saphsa Codling, Olivia Sexton, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 63% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,786,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#1,946
of 4,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,608
of 368,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#38
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.