↓ Skip to main content

New Isotopes and Proton Emitters–Crossing the Drip Line in the Vicinity of Sn100

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Isotopes and Proton Emitters–Crossing the Drip Line in the Vicinity of Sn100
Published in
Physical Review Letters, April 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.116.162501
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Čeliković, M. Lewitowicz, R. Gernhäuser, R. Krücken, S. Nishimura, H. Sakurai, D.S. Ahn, H. Baba, B. Blank, A. Blazhev, P. Boutachkov, F. Browne, G. de France, P. Doornenbal, T. Faestermann, Y. Fang, N. Fukuda, J. Giovinazzo, N. Goel, M. Górska, S. Ilieva, N. Inabe, T. Isobe, A. Jungclaus, D. Kameda, Y.-K. Kim, Y. K. Kwon, I. Kojouharov, T. Kubo, N. Kurz, G. Lorusso, D. Lubos, K. Moschner, D. Murai, I. Nishizuka, J. Park, Z. Patel, M. Rajabali, S. Rice, H. Schaffner, Y. Shimizu, L. Sinclair, P.-A. Söderström, K. Steiger, T. Sumikama, H. Suzuki, H. Takeda, Z. Wang, H. Watanabe, J. Wu, Z. Xu

Abstract

Several new isotopes, ^{96}In, ^{94}Cd, ^{92}Ag, and ^{90}Pd, have been identified at the RIKEN Nishina Center. The study of proton drip-line nuclei in the vicinity of ^{100}Sn led to the discovery of new proton emitters ^{93}Ag and ^{89}Rh with half-lives in the submicrosecond range. The systematics of the half-lives of odd-Z nuclei with T_{z}=-1/2 toward ^{99}Sn shows a stabilizing effect of the Z=50 shell closure. Production cross sections for nuclei in the vicinity of ^{100}Sn measured at different energies and target thicknesses were compared to the cross sections calculated by epax taking into account contributions of secondary reactions in the primary target.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 55%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 22 71%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,459,052
of 10,711,710 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#15,298
of 20,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,781
of 276,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#272
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,711,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.