You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BOLD Correlates of Trial-by-Trial Reaction Time Variability in Gray and White Matter: A Multi-Study fMRI Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tal Yarkoni, Deanna M. Barch, Jeremy R. Gray, Thomas E. Conturo, Todd S. Braver |
| Abstract |
Reaction time (RT) is one of the most widely used measures of performance in experimental psychology, yet relatively few fMRI studies have included trial-by-trial differences in RT as a predictor variable in their analyses. Using a multi-study approach, we investigated whether there are brain regions that show a general relationship between trial-by-trial RT variability and activation across a range of cognitive tasks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Denmark | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 106 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 155 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 62 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,457,124
of 24,661,808 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,453
of 213,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,416
of 181,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#129
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.