You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1811424 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart J Spechler, John G Hunter, Karen M Jones, Robert Lee, Brian R Smith, Hiroshi Mashimo, Vivian M Sanchez, Kerry B Dunbar, Thai H Pham, Uma K Murthy, Taewan Kim, Christian S Jackson, Jason M Wallen, Erik C von Rosenvinge, Jonathan P Pearl, Loren Laine, Anthony W Kim, Andrew M Kaz, Roger P Tatum, Ziad F Gellad, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan, Joel H Rubenstein, Amir A Ghaferi, Wai-Kit Lo, Ronald S Fernando, Bobby S Chan, Shirley C Paski, Dawn Provenzale, Donald O Castell, David Lieberman, Rhonda F Souza, William D Chey, Stuart R Warren, Anne Davis-Karim, Shelby D Melton, Robert M Genta, Tracey Serpi, Kousick Biswas, Grant D Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 424 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 104 | 25% |
| Mexico | 26 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 11 | 3% |
| Spain | 10 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 9 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 9 | 2% |
| Colombia | 9 | 2% |
| Argentina | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 148 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 294 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 65 | 15% |
| Scientists | 57 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 67 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 77 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 440. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#65,231
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,978
of 32,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,298
of 370,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#50
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.