↓ Skip to main content

Genotype–phenotype analysis of 523 patients by genetics evaluation and clinical exome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype–phenotype analysis of 523 patients by genetics evaluation and clinical exome sequencing
Published in
Pediatric Research, October 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41390-019-0611-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark N. Ziats, Ayesha Ahmad, John A. Bernat, Rachel Fisher, Megan Glassford, Mark C. Hannibal, Joseph E. Jacher, Natasha Weiser, Catherine E. Keegan, Kristen N. Lee, Tessa B. Marzulla, Bridget C. O’Connor, Shane C. Quinonez, Lauren Seemann, Lauren Turner, Stephanie Bielas, Nicholas L. Harris, Jacob D. Ogle, Jeffrey W. Innis, Donna M. Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,697,112
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#1,586
of 5,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,546
of 360,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#45
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.