↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 301 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Student > Master 40 13%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 112 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 123 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#750,149
of 24,309,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,475
of 12,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,116
of 360,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,309,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.