↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#697,734
of 14,308,949 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,104
of 10,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,764
of 319,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,308,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.