↓ Skip to main content

Familial Background Factors And Their Association With Non-Organic Visual Loss

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<p>Familial Background Factors And Their Association With Non-Organic Visual Loss</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s212365
Authors

Misuzu Takahashi, Hiroshi Kunikata, Keiichi Kato, Ayako Kawakami, Toru Nakazawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Psychology 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,505,233
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,292
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,504
of 339,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.