You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy utilizing CT‐based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG‐179
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1118/1.3690466 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean‐Pierre Bissonnette, Peter A. Balter, Lei Dong, Katja M. Langen, D. Michael Lovelock, Moyed Miften, Douglas J. Moseley, Jean Pouliot, Jan‐Jakob Sonke, Sua Yoo |
| Abstract |
Commercial CT-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) systems allow widespread management of geometric variations in patient setup and internal organ motion. This document provides consensus recommendations for quality assurance protocols that ensure patient safety and patient treatment fidelity for such systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 436 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 84 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Other | 53 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 179 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 19% |
| Engineering | 21 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 120 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,607,889
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#1,876
of 7,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,165
of 163,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#29
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.