You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Poor health workforce planning is costly, risky and inequitable
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.191241 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ivy Bourgeault, Sarah Simkin, Caroline Chamberland-Rowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 81 | 65% |
United States | 5 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 65 | 52% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 28% |
Scientists | 20 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 24% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#424,522
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#749
of 9,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,300
of 372,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#17
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.