↓ Skip to main content

Polygenic Sex Determination System in Zebrafish

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polygenic Sex Determination System in Zebrafish
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woei Chang Liew, Richard Bartfai, Zijie Lim, Rajini Sreenivasan, Kellee R. Siegfried, Laszlo Orban

Abstract

Despite the popularity of zebrafish as a research model, its sex determination (SD) mechanism is still unknown. Most cytogenetic studies failed to find dimorphic sex chromosomes and no primary sex determining switch has been identified even though the assembly of zebrafish genome sequence is near to completion and a high resolution genetic map is available. Recent publications suggest that environmental factors within the natural range have minimal impact on sex ratios of zebrafish populations. The primary aim of this study is to find out more about how sex is determined in zebrafish.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
New Caledonia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 234 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 20%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,261,339
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,847
of 207,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,034
of 164,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,265
of 3,746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.