↓ Skip to main content

A Majority of FXTAS Cases Present with Intranuclear Inclusions Within Purkinje Cells

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Majority of FXTAS Cases Present with Intranuclear Inclusions Within Purkinje Cells
Published in
The Cerebellum, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12311-016-0776-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanelle Ariza, Hailee Rogers, Angela Monterrubio, Adriana Reyes-Miranda, Paul J. Hagerman, Verónica Martínez-Cerdeño

Abstract

Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects carriers of a FMR1 premutation. Symptoms include cerebellar ataxia, tremor, and cognitive deficits. The most characteristic pathology of FXTAS is the presence of eosinophilic ubiquitin-positive intranuclear inclusions in neurons and astrocytes throughout the nervous system and non-nervous tissues. Inclusions are present in neurons throughout the brain but are widely believed not to be present in the Purkinje cells (PCs) of the cerebellum. However, we analyzed 26 postmortem cases of FXTAS and demonstrated that 65 % of cases presented with inclusions within PCs of the cerebellum. We determined that the presence or absence of inclusions in PCs is correlated with age and that those cases with PC inclusions were overall 11 years older than those with no PC inclusions. Half of the cases with PCs with inclusions presented with twin nuclear inclusions. This novel finding demonstrating the presence of inclusions within PCs provides an insight into the understanding of the FXTAS motor symptoms and provides a novel target for the development of therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,810,041
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#609
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,434
of 302,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.