↓ Skip to main content

Body Adiposity Index Utilization in a Spanish Mediterranean Population: Comparison with the Body Mass Index

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body Adiposity Index Utilization in a Spanish Mediterranean Population: Comparison with the Body Mass Index
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angel A. López, Mey L. Cespedes, Teofila Vicente, Matias Tomas, Miguel Bennasar-Veny, Pedro Tauler, Antoni Aguilo

Abstract

Body fat content and fat distribution or adiposity are indicators of health risk. Several techniques have been developed and used for assessing and/or determining body fat or adiposity. Recently, the Body Adiposity Index (BAI), which is based on the measurements of hip circumference and height, has been suggested as a new index of adiposity. The aim of the study was to compare BAI and BMI measurements in a Caucasian population from a European Mediterranean area and to assess the usefulness of the BAI in men and women separately.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 32%
Sports and Recreations 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,572,123
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#77,526
of 217,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,477
of 166,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#824
of 3,678 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,678 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.