You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Materials for pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-019-0917-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuan Chen, Xinlei Chen, Yali Zhang, Fangjie Zhou, Jiaxin Deng, Jing Zou, Yan Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 106 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 101 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,697,802
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#189
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,688
of 360,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.