You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Difficulties with estimating and interpreting species pools and the implications for understanding patterns of diversity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, March 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02803140 |
Authors |
James B. Grace |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Czechia | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 48 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Professor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2005.
All research outputs
#7,598,973
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#38
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,240
of 40,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them