↓ Skip to main content

Restraint minimisation in mental health care: legitimate or illegitimate force? An ethnographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restraint minimisation in mental health care: legitimate or illegitimate force? An ethnographic study
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, October 2019
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mick McKeown, Gill Thomson, Amy Scholes, Fiona Jones, Soo Downe, Owen Price, John Baker, Paul Greenwood, Richard Whittington, Joy Duxbury

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Librarian 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#620,534
of 17,036,910 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#77
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,393
of 333,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,036,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.