↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Imitation on Vaccination Behavior in Social Contact Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impact of Imitation on Vaccination Behavior in Social Contact Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martial L. Ndeffo Mbah, Jingzhou Liu, Chris T. Bauch, Yonas I. Tekel, Jan Medlock, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Alison P. Galvani

Abstract

Previous game-theoretic studies of vaccination behavior typically have often assumed that populations are homogeneously mixed and that individuals are fully rational. In reality, there is heterogeneity in the number of contacts per individual, and individuals tend to imitate others who appear to have adopted successful strategies. Here, we use network-based mathematical models to study the effects of both imitation behavior and contact heterogeneity on vaccination coverage and disease dynamics. We integrate contact network epidemiological models with a framework for decision-making, within which individuals make their decisions either based purely on payoff maximization or by imitating the vaccination behavior of a social contact. Simulations suggest that when the cost of vaccination is high imitation behavior may decrease vaccination coverage. However, when the cost of vaccination is small relative to that of infection, imitation behavior increases vaccination coverage, but, surprisingly, also increases the magnitude of epidemics through the clustering of non-vaccinators within the network. Thus, imitation behavior may impede the eradication of infectious diseases. Calculations that ignore behavioral clustering caused by imitation may significantly underestimate the levels of vaccination coverage required to attain herd immunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Computer Science 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Physics and Astronomy 14 9%
Other 44 29%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,679,496
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,685
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,538
of 174,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#32
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.