You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12550 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel A. Naranjo‐Ortiz, Toni Gabaldón |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Spain | 8 | 6% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 72 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 62 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 834 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 834 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 11% |
| Researcher | 78 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 13% |
| Unknown | 311 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 196 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 116 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 92 | 11% |
| Unknown | 337 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#534,089
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#118
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,800
of 379,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.