↓ Skip to main content

Connecting the dots between different networks: miRNAs associated with bladder cancer risk and progression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Connecting the dots between different networks: miRNAs associated with bladder cancer risk and progression
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13046-019-1406-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelia Braicu, Rares Buiga, Roxana Cojocneanu, Mihail Buse, Lajos Raduly, Laura Ancuta Pop, Sergiu Chira, Liviuta Budisan, Ancuta Jurj, Cristina Ciocan, Lorand Magdo, Alexandru Irimie, Florentin Dobrota, Bogdan Petrut, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,230,993
of 14,759,838 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#532
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,102
of 321,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#99
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,759,838 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.