↓ Skip to main content

Warm Body Temperature Facilitates Energy Efficient Cortical Action Potentials

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Warm Body Temperature Facilitates Energy Efficient Cortical Action Potentials
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuguo Yu, Adam P. Hill, David A. McCormick

Abstract

The energy efficiency of neural signal transmission is important not only as a limiting factor in brain architecture, but it also influences the interpretation of functional brain imaging signals. Action potential generation in mammalian, versus invertebrate, axons is remarkably energy efficient. Here we demonstrate that this increase in energy efficiency is due largely to a warmer body temperature. Increases in temperature result in an exponential increase in energy efficiency for single action potentials by increasing the rate of Na(+) channel inactivation, resulting in a marked reduction in overlap of the inward Na(+), and outward K(+), currents and a shortening of action potential duration. This increase in single spike efficiency is, however, counterbalanced by a temperature-dependent decrease in the amplitude and duration of the spike afterhyperpolarization, resulting in a nonlinear increase in the spike firing rate, particularly at temperatures above approximately 35°C. Interestingly, the total energy cost, as measured by the multiplication of total Na(+) entry per spike and average firing rate in response to a constant input, reaches a global minimum between 37-42°C. Our results indicate that increases in temperature result in an unexpected increase in energy efficiency, especially near normal body temperature, thus allowing the brain to utilize an energy efficient neural code.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 13 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 14%
Engineering 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,474,477
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,600
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,956
of 174,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#50
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.