↓ Skip to main content

The Development and Characterization of a Human Mesothelioma In Vitro 3D Model to Investigate Immunotoxin Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Development and Characterization of a Human Mesothelioma In Vitro 3D Model to Investigate Immunotoxin Therapy
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinran Xiang, Yen Phung, Mingqian Feng, Kunio Nagashima, Jingli Zhang, V. Courtney Broaddus, Raffit Hassan, David FitzGerald, Mitchell Ho

Abstract

Tumor microenvironments present significant barriers to penetration by antibodies and immunoconjugates. Tumor microenvironments, however, are difficult to study in vitro. Cells cultured as monolayers exhibit less resistance to therapy than those grown in vivo and an alternative research model more representative of the in vivo tumor is more desirable. SS1P is an immunotoxin composed of the Fv portion of a mesothelin-specific antibody fused to a bacterial toxin that is presently undergoing clinical trials in mesothelioma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 4%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Engineering 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,354,734
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,697
of 202,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,559
of 186,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#362
of 1,269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.