↓ Skip to main content

Genetic counselling and personalised risk assessment in the Australian pancreatic cancer screening program

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic counselling and personalised risk assessment in the Australian pancreatic cancer screening program
Published in
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13053-019-0129-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Dwarte, Skye McKay, Amber Johns, Katherine Tucker, Allan D. Spigelman, David Williams, Alina Stoita

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,568,546
of 14,218,657 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#130
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,839
of 316,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,218,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.