↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Lipid-based nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Patents Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lipid-based nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery
Published in
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.001
Pubmed ID
27080735
Authors

Zhigao Niu, Inmaculada Conejos-Sánchez, Brendan T. Griffin, Caitriona M. O’Driscoll, María J. Alonso

Abstract

This article is aimed to overview the lipid-based nanostructures designed so far for the oral administration of peptides and proteins, and to analyze the influence of their composition and physicochemical (particle size, zeta potential) and pharmaceutical (drug loading and release) properties, on their interaction with the gastro-intestinal environment, and the subsequent PK/PD profile of the associated drugs. The ultimate goal has been to highlight and comparatively analyze the key factors that may be determinant of the success of these nanocarriers for oral peptide delivery. The article ends with some prospects on the challenges to be addressed for the intended commercial success of these delivery vehicles.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 23%
Student > Master 48 17%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 64 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 85 30%
Chemistry 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 81 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,164,092
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#1,365
of 2,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,931
of 311,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.