↓ Skip to main content

Dualization, stratification, liberalization, or what? An attempt to clarify the conceptual underpinnings of the dualization debate

Overview of attention for article published in Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dualization, stratification, liberalization, or what? An attempt to clarify the conceptual underpinnings of the dualization debate
Published in
Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/psrm.2019.47
Authors

Marius Busemeyer, Achim Kemmerling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Lecturer 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 75%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,939,377
of 15,355,386 outputs
Outputs from Political Science Research and Methods
#132
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,869
of 326,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Science Research and Methods
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,355,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.