↓ Skip to main content

La Niña-driven flooding in the Indo-Pacific warm pool during the past millennium

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La Niña-driven flooding in the Indo-Pacific warm pool during the past millennium
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106020
Authors

Jessica R. Rodysill, James M. Russell, Mathias Vuille, Sylvia Dee, Brent Lunghino, Satria Bijaksana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 61%
Chemistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,783,401
of 14,969,364 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#1,778
of 2,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,572
of 322,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#63
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,969,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.