↓ Skip to main content

Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012888.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kee Thai Yeo, Juin Yee Kong, Arun Sasi, Kenneth Tan, Nai Ming Lai, Tim Schindler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Unspecified 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,419,980
of 14,634,925 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,885
of 11,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,441
of 322,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,634,925 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.