You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the Use of Patient Preference Information as Scientific Evidence in Medical Product Evaluation: A Summary Report of the Patient Preference Workshop
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40271-019-00396-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather L. Benz, Ting-Hsuan (Joyce) Lee, Jui-Hua Tsai, John F. P. Bridges, Sara Eggers, Megan Moncur, Fadia T. Shaya, Ira Shoulson, Erica S. Spatz, Leslie Wilson, Anindita Saha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,096,928
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#376
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,647
of 478,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.