↓ Skip to main content

Donald Trump and Post-Pivot Asia: The Implications of a “Transactional” Approach to Foreign Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 366)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Donald Trump and Post-Pivot Asia: The Implications of a “Transactional” Approach to Foreign Policy
Published in
Asian Studies Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2019.1680604
Authors

Mark Beeson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,388,863
of 14,860,150 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#38
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,364
of 318,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,860,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.