You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Towards a TILLING platform for functional genomics in Piel de Sapo melons
BMC Research Notes, August 2011
Mireia González, Meihong Xu, Cristina Esteras, Cristina Roig, Antonio J Monforte, Christelle Troadec, Marta Pujol, Fernando Nuez, Abdelhafid Bendahmane, Jordi Garcia-Mas, Belén Picó
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||10||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||8||11%|
|Student > Postgraduate||6||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||54||74%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||9||12%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 121,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.