↓ Skip to main content

Deliberation Versus Intuition: Decomposing the Role of Expertise in Judgment and Decision Making

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deliberation Versus Intuition: Decomposing the Role of Expertise in Judgment and Decision Making
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/bdm.1759
Authors

Koen A. Dijkstra, Joop van der Pligt, Gerben A. van Kleef

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 39%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 23%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Decision Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#6,540,449
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
#230
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,231
of 177,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.